Posts Tagged Lim Guan Eng

Dear Chief Minister, Bear Some Responsibility

Dear Chief Minister, Mr. Lim Guan Eng:

Sorry to bother you, but it’s me again. Yea, the one who asked you to give a verifiable source to the data you quoted. Thanks to a reader, Leong JT, I now know the data first surfaced in Business Times. Crucially, it was the Transport Ministry’s special maritime adviser, Datuk Captain Abdul Rahim Abd Aziz who made the mistake in the data.

Obaid Mansor, PPSB General Manager of Containers Strategic Business Unit, clarified that they have notified the Ministry of Transport about the error, but it was not widely reported. He was being gentlemanly, compared to the Managing Director, in saying that perhaps “nobody saw that” and he believed you have “picked up the wrong report.”

Now that all that is sorted out, everything is fine and dandy – except for this. Sure, you are only quoting the figures from the ministry, and we all know he made an honest mistake. However, we also know you relied on the figures without verifying it first with PPSB. Perhaps the state government’s relationship with PPSB is less than friendly. In that case, you could have relied on  the data provided by SERI.

We are not blaming you for relying on a wrong report. After all, it was wrong, and it’s not really your fault. We are, however, holding you accountable for making inaccurate conclusions without seeking clarifications. You did say “if there is anything wrong in the report, the person concerned should take the responsibility to correct it.” Therefore, we should hold you to the same standard you espouse, and you should take some responsibility for making the report that the cargo traffic dropped 24%.

Commentators from various websites seem to agree:

You cannot pass the ball back to the person preparing the report. You are the one reading it and therefore has to be 100% responsible for its accuracy. You are suppose to be the CEO of Penang and not a copy speech writer of Penang. I am not happy that each time after you have made a statement, and if someone points out to you of an error, straight away, you go into defensive gear and blame somebody for providing you the information. Ridiculous! (by concerned, 26/09/09, TheMalaysianInsider)

Its worrying when important figures like the CM of Penang can get his facts wrong! What message is this sending us! (by Dzurina Razuan, 24/9/09, TheEdge)

I do have to wonder – is it so hard to take responsibility for it, even partially? It is, after all, just your honest mistake. This is not even the first time you relied on false information, and for that you admitted your mistake and apologised in the State Assembly of Penang. What changed this time? By not admitting it was partially your fault, you appear to be playing the blame game and shirk responsibility. By apologising, you appear  courteous and gentlemanly, and you show that you, like the 6.2 billion or so human in this world, are just human who sometimes do make mistakes.

So, Chief Minister, please do try to verify your information with various sources next time, and when you do make an honest mistake, please be responsible by admitting it. That is what Competency and Accountability is all about.

Sincerely,
WhatTheToot!

Tags: , ,

Dear Chief Minister, Citation Needed

Dear Chief Minister of Penang, Mr. Lim Guan Eng:

How are you? I hope you are doing well and has recovered from your flu. Recently you published in your blog that the traffic at Penang Port, managed by Penang Port Sdn. Bhd., has declined sharply. Specifically, you said that the twenty-foot equivalent unit at said port has declined by 24% in the second quarter of 2009, compared to the first quarter. You proceeded to show following table, and quoted the source of “Ports, Marine Department”:

Your blog post generated quite some news, and unlike all the news reports, I tried to verify the data you have given. I went to the website of the Marine Department of Malaysia as well as the Department of Statistics Malaysia, but I couldn’t find the aforementioned table. It might be that my searching skill or my information source is not as great as yours. However, without you actually providing a verifiable data source or link, you reminded me a well known XKCD comic:

Then, this news surfaced, and followed by this. The Managing Director of Penang Port, Datuk Ahmad Ibnihajar, lambasted you for quoting the wrong figure. Admittedly, his reaction is overly excessive, and his statement that your figures will tarnish the port and cause quite some financial implication is, in my opinion, a little exaggerated.  He even called you a “clown”, as the Chinese daily reported, which is highly out of place.

He, however, does have a point. You see, I remembered a small research institution in Penang called SERI – the Socio-economical and Environmental Research Institute. In fact, SERI, which describe itself as the “Think Tank for the State of Penang”, has some prominent and re-nown researchers, and in fact is established by the State of Penang – the Penang State Government.

More importantly, SERI publishes important monthly research articles since 2003 and compiles quarterly statistics about Penang since 1999. On Page 22 of their latest statistical report for the second quater of 2009, this table is included:

cargo

If you calculated the figures, you would notice that the second quarter TEU traffic actually increased from 199391 to 255322. An increase of 25931 TEU, which is 13% – not a drop of 24%.

I don’t really know why you didn’t refer to the figure given by the SERI report – maybe you didn’t know it existed. Well, this is me informing you about the existence of SERI and their wonderful reports and research articles. Seriously, they have some good information and ideas there. Moreover, you could have just given the Penang Port Sdn. Bhd. a call, and I assume they would have cleared your doubts about the declining cargo traffic.

Thus, Chief Minister, please do try to verify your data, and give a verifiable data source next time in accordance to your governing mantra of Competency, Accountability and Transparency. More importantly, please read the various publications by SERI. I’m sure you will greatly benefit from it, and you will govern the state even better.

Sincerely,
WhatTheToot!

Tags: , ,

The new Penang State Government

Since the 12th Malaysian General Election on March 8, Penang (and another four states in Malaysia) has been in Pakatan Rakyat (PR) hand. Pakatan Rakyat is currently a loose coalition comprising of PKR, DAP and PAS. Each state has their own majority representatives and thus governed by different political party, but no doubt, all of them are Pakatan Rakyat – The People’s Alliance. What I would like to comment on today specifically touch on the new Penang State Government – loosely a DAP-PKR government.

How different is the new Penang State Government? Not much in certain aspects, in my humble opinion. Come tomorrow (9th May), it will be the 61st day they are in the government. While they have made some changes with respect to the old Barisan Nasional state government (indeed, some vastly different ones), nothing has changed in the aspect of replying a concerned citizen’s email.

When RapidPenang first started operating in Penang, I wrote an email (of my suggestions and recommendations) to the then acting-CEO of RapidPenang, which was the CEO of RapidKL. In addition, I forwarded the same letter to Dr. Teng Hock Nan, then Chairman Local Government, Traffic Management, Information and Community Relationship of Penang State, as well as Chairman of Public Works, Utilities (Energy, Water, Telecommunication) and Transportation (Air, Sea & Railway) Committee Koay Kar Huah. No one bothered to reply – I guess my opinion is not important enough to warrant a reply.

Come March 8, come new government. What has changed – Nothing. As soon as YB. Chow Kon Yeow was appointed EXCO for Local Government, Traffic Management and Environment of the new Penang State Government, I sent him the same letter on April 6. I did send copies to both his official Penang State Government issued email address as well as the one obtained from DAP website. One month has gone by without any reply whatsoever.

Talking about replying people’s email, I should mention about the new Chief Minister YAB Lim Guan Eng. As soon as he was elected, I sent him a congratulatory note coupled with recommendations and opinions about Penang on March 11. Knowing he was busy, I even wrote a point form summary of the email for him. Again, I sent the email to his state government email address as well as the one obtained from DAP website. Come May 11 it will be exactly two months without any reply.

I acknowledge that they are busy. I know that they have a lot of stuff to attend to. However, all I am seeking is a simple “Thank you for your view” reply, nothing more. In this era, emails should be replied, even with a short automated replies. It makes the sender feel more acknowledged and empowered. Since they are all so busy, I shall write a automated reply for them:

Dear (Sender’s Name),

Thank you for your input/ your views/ your opinion/ your questions/ your (whatever). I truly appreciate it and would look forward to further emails by you. However, due to the massive amount of emails I have, I apologise in advance for my inability to reply your email personally. Rest assured, I do read your email in full and I sincerely thank you again for your email.

Thank you,
(Replier’s Name)

What’s so hard? Jeff Ooi has replied my email (with 2 words), Lim Kit Siang has replied my email (with 13 words) too. Although short, the emails make me feel important and appreciated. Why should Lim Guan Eng and Chow Kon Yeow be any different?

The new Penang State Government is TOOT in some aspect, which disappoints me.

Tags: , , ,